Introduction
California, with its pleasant climate, innovative industries, and diverse culture, has attracted countless individuals. However, from a tax perspective, California is notoriously complex, particularly regarding residency determination, where it stands as one of the strictest states in the U.S. For Japanese individuals considering or having already returned to Japan, the status of being a ‘California resident’ can lead to unexpected tax burdens and complex filing obligations—a crucial pitfall often overlooked.
This article comprehensively explains everything from the basics of California’s residency determination to the specific issues one might face after returning to Japan, and effective countermeasures. Our aim is to provide such a thorough and detailed explanation, complete with explanations of technical terms and practical advice, that readers will feel they ‘completely understand’ the topic after reading it.
Basics: What is California Residency Determination?
The Importance of Residency Determination
Whether one is determined a ‘Resident’ or ‘Nonresident’ in California has a decisive impact on the scope of state tax. California residents are subject to California state tax on all their worldwide income, regardless of where that income is earned (the worldwide income taxation principle). In contrast, nonresidents are only taxed on income sourced within California.
This distinction is significant. For example, if you are deemed a California resident, income earned in Japan, such as salary, business income, or real estate income, could be subject to not only Japanese taxes but also California state taxes.
Differences Between Federal and State Residency Determination
U.S. federal tax residency determination (e.g., Green Card Test, Substantial Presence Test) and California state tax residency determination are based on different criteria. It is not uncommon for an individual to be a nonresident for federal tax purposes but a resident for California state tax purposes. Therefore, it is extremely risky to assume that you have no California state tax obligations based solely on your federal tax filing status.
Detailed Analysis: Strict Criteria for Residency Determination
California’s residency determination primarily revolves around two concepts: ‘Domicile’ and ‘Temporary or Transitory Purpose.’ The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) interprets these concepts very strictly and tends to assert its right to tax individuals as residents.
What is Domicile?
Domicile refers to the place where an individual intends to make their permanent home and to which they intend to return whenever they are absent. Domicile involves not only physical presence but also the individual’s ‘intent,’ which is a crucial factor. Once domicile is established in California, it is very difficult to change. To change domicile, both of the following conditions must be met simultaneously:
- Physical Relocation: Physically leaving California and moving to a new location.
- Intent to Change Domicile: Clearly demonstrating the intent to abandon California as a permanent home and establish a new location as the permanent home.
When assessing the intent to change domicile, the FTB considers not only formal paperwork but also a comprehensive range of ‘Facts and Circumstances’ related to an individual’s entire lifestyle.
Temporary or Transitory Purpose
Even if an individual’s domicile is outside California, they may still be considered a resident if the FTB determines that their presence in California is not for a ‘temporary or transitory purpose.’ This concept is particularly applicable when an individual maintains significant economic, social, or familial ties to California. The FTB attempts to determine where the individual has the ‘Closest Connection.’
Specific Factors the FTB Considers for Residency Determination
The FTB comprehensively evaluates a wide range of factors when determining an individual’s residency status. Many of these factors serve as indicators to gauge the intent to change domicile or the strength of ties to California:
- Physical Presence: Comparison of days spent inside California versus outside California. Especially if you spend more than nine months in California during a year, a ‘Presumption of Residency’ applies, meaning you are considered a resident unless proven otherwise.
- Location of Principal Residence: Where your primary home is located, whether owned or rented. The movement of furniture and household goods is also considered.
- Location of Family: Where your spouse and dependents reside. If family remains in California, the risk of being deemed a resident increases.
- Location of Employment/Business: Where your workplace or business activities are primarily located. Even with remote work, caution is advised if your employer is based in California.
- Driver’s License and Vehicle Registration: Whether you hold a California driver’s license or have vehicles registered in California.
- Voter Registration: Whether you are registered to vote in California.
- Bank and Brokerage Accounts: Whether you maintain primary accounts with financial institutions in California.
- Professional Licenses: Whether you hold professional licenses (e.g., doctor, lawyer) in California.
- Medical and Dental Care Providers: Whether your primary healthcare providers are located in California.
- Club and Organization Memberships: Whether you belong to social clubs, professional organizations, or charitable groups in California.
- Mailing Address: Whether your primary mailing address is in California.
- Property Ownership: Whether you own real estate in California. Even investment properties can be a factor in residency determination.
- Children’s Schools: Whether your children attend schools in California.
- Tax Filing History: Whether you have previously filed as a California resident.
These factors are not individually determinative but are used collectively to ascertain which state has the strongest connections to the individual. When returning to Japan, a deliberate and thorough effort is required to sever ties with California.
Returning to Japan and the ‘Leaving California’ Trap
Simply returning to Japan does not automatically make you a nonresident of California. The FTB may continue to consider you a resident as long as ‘significant ties’ to California remain. This is particularly true if economic ties (e.g., real estate, investments, businesses) or family ties (e.g., spouse or children remaining in California) persist.
‘Severing Ties’ refers to a series of actions aimed not just at physically leaving the state, but at breaking connections with California across many of the factors the FTB considers important, and establishing connections with your new place of residence (in this case, Japan). This process is not something that can be accomplished overnight; it requires careful planning and conscious execution.
The Possibility of Dual Residency
It is possible to fall into a state of ‘dual residency,’ where you are considered a resident under Japanese tax law while also being deemed a resident under California tax law. In such cases, there is a risk of being taxed on worldwide income by both Japan and California.
The U.S.-Japan Tax Treaty primarily aims to prevent double taxation at the federal level and does not directly apply to state-level taxes like California’s. Therefore, it is important to note that the existence of a tax treaty does not exempt you from California’s residency determination. The application of the Foreign Tax Credit is also limited and may not fully offset the burden of California state tax.
Case Studies and Calculation Examples
Case Study 1: Likely to be Deemed a California Resident
Mr. Tanaka worked in California for five years before being transferred to his company’s headquarters in Japan, returning alone. However, he left his wife and children in their owned home in California and visits them in California several times a year. He still holds a California driver’s license and bank accounts, and a portion of his Japanese salary is transferred to his California bank account.
- FTB’s Determination: It is highly likely that Mr. Tanaka’s domicile will still be considered in California. Many close ties to California remain, including his family residing there, maintaining an owned home, regular returns to California, and holding a California driver’s license and bank accounts.
- Tax Risk: He is likely to be subject to California state tax on his worldwide income, including the salary earned in Japan.
Case Study 2: Likely to be Deemed No Longer a California Resident
Mr. Sato completed his work in California and decided to move permanently to Japan with his entire family. He sold his home in California and terminated his rental agreement. He surrendered his California driver’s license and obtained a Japanese one. He closed his California bank accounts and opened primary accounts in Japanese banks. He registered to vote in Japan and resigned from all clubs and organizations in California. Since returning, he has only visited California for tourism purposes.
- FTB’s Determination: It is highly likely that Mr. Sato will be deemed to have thoroughly severed his economic, social, and familial ties with California, and his intent to establish domicile in Japan is clear.
- Tax Risk: Only income sourced in California (if any) would be subject to California state tax, and the risk of being taxed on income earned in Japan is very low.
Case Study 3: Part-Year Resident
Ms. Suzuki ended her employment contract in California on June 30, 2023, and moved permanently to Japan with her family on July 1, the very next day. She vacated her California residence by the end of June and completed all procedures for her driver’s license and bank accounts before July 1.
- FTB’s Determination: Ms. Suzuki will be considered a California resident from January 1 to June 30, 2023, and a nonresident from July 1 onwards, making her a ‘Part-Year Resident.’
- Tax Risk: California state tax will be levied on her worldwide income from January 1 to June 30, 2023. From July 1 onwards, only California-sourced income will be subject to tax. In this case, the clear date of residency status change makes filing relatively straightforward.
Pros and Cons
Advantages of Changing California Residency Status
- Freedom from Worldwide Income Taxation: Eliminates the risk of California state tax on income earned in Japan, significantly reducing the tax burden.
- Simplified Filing Obligations: California filing obligations will be limited to California-sourced income only, freeing you from complex resident filings.
- Reduced Tax Audit Risk: Lowers the risk of being audited by the FTB regarding residency determination.
Disadvantages of Not Changing (or Being Unable to Change) California Residency Status
- High Tax Burden: Income earned in Japan may also be subject to California income tax, leading to a risk of double taxation. California’s income tax rates are high and can be a significant burden.
- Complex Tax Filings: The need to file worldwide income in both Japan and California makes tax filings very complicated.
- FTB Audit Risk: If ties to California remain, the risk of a ‘Residency Audit’ by the FTB increases. Audits are time-consuming, costly, and mentally taxing.
- Penalties and Interest: Failure to file correctly can result in penalties and interest on unpaid taxes.
Common Pitfalls and Important Considerations
- Misconception of ‘Just Moving Out’: Simply physically moving out of California does not automatically make you a nonresident. Many people misunderstand this point.
- Maintaining California Driver’s License and Bank Accounts: These are highly weighted factors by the FTB in residency determination. Maintaining them after returning to Japan makes it more likely you will be deemed a resident.
- Leaving Real Estate in California: Whether for investment or as a vacant property, owning real estate in California is a significant factor in residency determination.
- Leaving Family in California: If your spouse or children continue to live in California, it becomes harder to prove that your domicile has completely shifted.
- Ignoring FTB Notices: Ignoring letters or notices from the FTB can lead to unfavorable determinations. Prompt action is crucial.
- Misconception that Federal Non-residency is Sufficient: As mentioned, federal and California state residency determinations differ. It is entirely possible to be a federal nonresident but a California state resident.
- Overreliance on Tax Treaties: The U.S.-Japan Tax Treaty does not directly apply to state taxes like California’s, so its impact on state residency determination is limited.
- Insufficient Documentation: To prove your intent to change residency status, it is essential to gather specific supporting documents such as property sale/rental agreements, utility disconnection/new connection statements, airline tickets, surrender of driver’s license proof, voter registration changes, etc.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: Why might I still need to pay California state tax even after returning to Japan?
A1: California applies the worldwide income taxation principle to its residents. This means that as long as you are considered a resident, all your income, regardless of where it is earned globally, is subject to California state tax. Even after returning to Japan, if the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) determines that you have not completely severed your ‘domicile’ or ‘closest connections’ with California, you may still be considered a resident and potentially be taxed on income earned in Japan.
Q2: How can I prove that I am no longer a California resident?
A2: To prove you are no longer a California resident, you must demonstrate that you have thoroughly severed your economic, social, and familial ties with California and clearly established ties with your new place of residence (Japan). Specifically, this includes actions such as selling/terminating your California residence, surrendering your driver’s license, changing voter registration, closing bank accounts, moving your family, changing employment/business locations, abandoning professional licenses, withdrawing from clubs/organizations, and more. A wide range of actions and supporting documents are required, as these factors are considered holistically.
Q3: If I own property in California, am I automatically considered a resident?
A3: Owning property in California in itself does not automatically make you a resident, but it is a significant factor considered by the FTB in residency determination. Especially if the property was a former principal residence, if family members reside there, or if there is an intent to return in the future, the risk of being deemed a resident increases. Even investment rental properties can influence residency determination when combined with other factors.
Q4: If I abandon my U.S. Green Card, does California state tax residency determination become irrelevant?
A4: Abandoning a U.S. Green Card directly impacts federal tax residency determination, but it is considered independently for California state tax residency. Even if you abandon your Green Card, if the FTB determines that you still maintain your ‘domicile’ or ‘closest connections’ with California, you may still be considered a California resident. California’s residency determination is based on an individual’s overall living situation, not just the presence or absence of a Green Card. Therefore, careful consideration of all the aforementioned factors is necessary even after abandoning your Green Card.
Conclusion
California’s residency determination, due to its strictness and complexity, can pose an unexpected tax pitfall for many Japanese individuals considering a return to Japan. Simply physically leaving the state is insufficient; a deliberate and thorough process of ‘Severing Ties’—breaking economic, social, and familial connections with California—is essential.
Clearly establishing your intent to change domicile, acting strategically considering the wide range of factors the FTB emphasizes, and documenting all these actions are key to success. If your situation is complex or if you have concerns about residency determination, it is strongly recommended to consult a professional (CPA or tax advisor) who is knowledgeable in both U.S. and California tax laws for specific advice tailored to your individual circumstances. Proactive planning and professional support are the best defenses against potential high tax burdens and unexpected troubles in the future.
#California Tax #Residency #Domicile #Expatriate Tax #Japan Tax #FTB #State Tax #Tax Planning #International Tax #US Tax