US Tax: Demystifying Dependents and Spousal Deductions – Japan’s Income ‘Walls’ vs. US MFJ, ITIN Hurdles, and Treaty Benefits

/ Blog (EN), Tax / By

Introduction: The Intricacies of Dependent and Spousal Concepts in US and Japanese Tax Systems

The tax systems of the United States and Japan operate on fundamentally different philosophies, particularly regarding how family structure impacts tax liability. Concepts like “dependent deductions” and “spousal deductions” (扶養控除 and 配偶者控除 in Japan) highlight these distinctions. For U.S. taxpayers with a spouse residing in Japan, understanding these differences and navigating U.S. tax filing correctly is paramount. This article provides a comprehensive and detailed explanation of the U.S. tax treatment of dependents and spouses, contrasting it with Japan’s “¥1.03 million/¥1.3 million income walls.” We will delve into the requirements for including a Japan-resident spouse in a U.S. tax return, the challenges of obtaining an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN), and the implications of the U.S.-Japan Tax Treaty.

Basic Knowledge: Tax Philosophies and Key Concepts in the US and Japan

Japan’s Tax System: The Concepts of “Dependents” and “Spouses”

In Japan’s tax system, the presence of a spouse or dependents directly influences income deductions. Two widely known income thresholds, often referred to as “walls,” are particularly relevant:

  • The ¥1.03 Million Wall: If a spouse’s annual income is ¥1.03 million or less, the taxpayer can claim a “Spousal Deduction” (配偶者控除). This reduces the taxpayer’s taxable income and, consequently, their income tax burden.
  • The ¥1.3 Million (or ¥1.06 Million) Wall: If a spouse’s annual income exceeds ¥1.3 million (or ¥1.06 million for certain company sizes), the spouse is no longer considered a dependent for social insurance purposes (health insurance and employee pension). This means the spouse must start paying their own social insurance premiums. While not a direct tax, it significantly impacts the household’s net income.

These thresholds are crucial benchmarks for optimizing the total tax and social insurance burden for a household. Japan’s tax system often considers the household situation more comprehensively than just individual income.

US Tax System: The Concepts of “Dependents” and “Spouses”

The U.S. tax system also considers family structure, but through different mechanisms. Personal exemptions, which previously allowed deductions for the taxpayer, spouse, and dependents, were eliminated from 2018 onwards. The current system primarily relies on the following:

  • Standard Deduction: A fixed dollar amount that reduces taxable income, varying based on the taxpayer’s filing status (e.g., Single, Married Filing Jointly). Married Filing Jointly (MFJ) status offers a significantly higher standard deduction than Single, effectively serving a similar role to Japan’s spousal deduction by lowering taxable income.
  • Itemized Deductions: Specific expenses (e.g., medical expenses, state and local taxes, home mortgage interest, charitable contributions) that can be deducted if their total exceeds the standard deduction.
  • Tax Credits: These directly reduce the amount of tax owed, dollar for dollar, making them generally more valuable than deductions. Key examples include the Child Tax Credit (CTC) and the Credit for Other Dependents (ODC).

In the U.S. tax system, there is no direct deduction for a spouse as a “dependent.” Instead, the spouse’s presence primarily affects the taxpayer’s “Filing Status,” which in turn determines the applicable standard deduction and tax brackets.

Detailed Analysis: Specific Treatment of “Dependents” and “Spouses” in the US

Definition and Requirements for a U.S. “Dependent”

U.S. tax law classifies dependents into two main categories: “Qualifying Child” and “Qualifying Relative.” A spouse does not fall under either of these definitions.

Qualifying Child

To be a qualifying child, an individual must meet all the following tests:

  • Relationship Test: Be the taxpayer’s son, daughter, stepchild, foster child, brother, sister, half-brother, half-sister, stepbrother, stepsister, or a descendant of any of them.
  • Age Test: Be under age 19 at the end of the tax year, or under age 24 if a full-time student. There is no age limit for permanently and totally disabled individuals.
  • Residency Test: Have lived with the taxpayer for more than half the year (temporary absences are excluded).
  • Support Test: The child must not have provided more than half of their own support for the year.
  • Joint Return Test: The child cannot file a joint return for the year (unless filed only to claim a refund of withheld income tax or estimated tax paid).

Qualifying Relative

An individual who is not a qualifying child may be a qualifying relative if they meet all the following tests:

  • Not a Qualifying Child Test: The person cannot be a qualifying child of any taxpayer.
  • Relationship or Member of Household Test: The person must either be related to the taxpayer in one of several specified ways (e.g., parent, grandparent, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew) or have lived with the taxpayer all year as a member of their household.
  • Gross Income Test: The person’s gross income for the year must be less than a specified amount ($4,700 for 2023).
  • Support Test: The taxpayer must have provided more than half of the person’s total support for the year.
  • Joint Return Test: The person cannot file a joint return for the year.

If an individual meets these dependent criteria, they may qualify the taxpayer for the Child Tax Credit (CTC) or the Credit for Other Dependents (ODC).

Spousal Filing Status and “Married Filing Jointly (MFJ)”

The treatment of a spouse in the U.S. tax system primarily occurs through the “Filing Status.” One of the most advantageous filing statuses is “Married Filing Jointly (MFJ).”

Benefits of Married Filing Jointly (MFJ)

  • Higher Standard Deduction: MFJ status offers a significantly higher standard deduction than filing as Single (e.g., $27,700 for MFJ vs. $13,850 for Single in 2023).
  • Lower Tax Brackets: Tax brackets for MFJ are generally wider, meaning a larger portion of income is taxed at lower rates compared to filing as Single or Married Filing Separately.
  • Access to Credits: Many tax credits (e.g., Child Tax Credit, education credits) are fully available or more favorably structured for taxpayers filing MFJ.

MFJ with a Non-Resident Alien (NRA) Spouse

When a U.S. citizen or Resident Alien has a Non-Resident Alien (NRA) spouse, the common practice is to file as “Married Filing Separately (MFS),” and the NRA spouse is not included on the U.S. tax return. However, to benefit from MFJ, the U.S. taxpayer can elect with the IRS to treat the NRA spouse as a “resident alien for tax purposes” (this is known as the IRC Section 6013(g) Election). This election means the NRA spouse will be treated as a U.S. resident for all U.S. tax purposes for that tax year.

Requirements for Including a Japan-Resident Spouse in a U.S. Return and the ITIN Hurdle

The phrase “including a Japan-resident spouse as a dependent in a U.S. return” strictly means making the 6013(g) election to treat the NRA spouse as a resident alien and then filing Married Filing Jointly (MFJ).

Requirements for the 6013(g) Election

  • Mutual Consent: Both the U.S. citizen/resident alien taxpayer and the NRA spouse must agree to the election to be treated as resident aliens and must sign the tax return jointly.
  • Taxpayer Identification Number: The NRA spouse must have either a U.S. Social Security Number (SSN) or an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN).
  • Worldwide Income Reporting: By making this election, the NRA spouse’s worldwide income (including all income earned in Japan) becomes subject to U.S. taxation and must be reported on the U.S. tax return.

The ITIN Acquisition Hurdle

If the NRA spouse does not have an SSN, they must obtain an ITIN. Obtaining an ITIN can be a significant hurdle, especially for individuals residing in Japan.

  • Application Process: It involves submitting IRS Form W-7 along with original supporting documentation (e.g., passport) or certified copies to prove identity and foreign status.
  • Sending Original Documents: A major inconvenience is the requirement to mail original passports to the IRS. This carries a risk of loss and means the passport will be unavailable for several weeks to months until it is returned.
  • Using a Certifying Acceptance Agent (CAA): To avoid mailing original documents, taxpayers can use an IRS-authorized Certifying Acceptance Agent (CAA). CAAs can verify original documents and submit certified copies with the W-7 application. While this eliminates the need to send originals, CAA services typically incur a fee.
  • Processing Time: ITIN applications usually take several weeks to months to process. This requires early planning to ensure the ITIN is received before the tax filing deadline.

The ITIN acquisition process is often the biggest obstacle for couples considering the MFJ election with an NRA spouse.

Income Deductions via the U.S.-Japan Tax Treaty

The U.S.-Japan Tax Treaty aims to prevent double taxation and tax evasion. When the 6013(g) election is made to treat an NRA spouse as a U.S. resident for tax purposes, that spouse’s worldwide income becomes subject to U.S. taxation.

  • General Principle: Income of a spouse treated as a resident alien under the 6013(g) election is generally taxed according to U.S. domestic law. In this scenario, the treaty’s definition of “resident” typically does not apply to the electing spouse for the purpose of excluding their worldwide income.
  • Foreign Tax Credit: For income taxed by both Japan and the U.S., the U.S. taxpayer can generally claim a Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) to offset U.S. tax liability. This helps mitigate double taxation.
  • Specific Treaty Articles: While the treaty contains special provisions for certain types of income (e.g., pensions, income for students/researchers), their applicability to a spouse who has made the 6013(g) election can be complex. Generally, once the spouse is treated as a U.S. resident for tax purposes, their income is taxed under U.S. domestic law, and it becomes less likely that specific treaty exemptions for non-residents would apply to their worldwide income. Consult with a tax professional, as complex rules like the “Saving Clause” in the treaty can impact specific situations.

In conclusion, the primary goal of the 6013(g) election is to gain the tax benefits of MFJ, and it is often difficult to fully exempt the NRA spouse’s Japanese income via the treaty once the election is made. The focus shifts to adjusting for double taxation through the Foreign Tax Credit.

Practical Case Studies and Calculation Examples

Let’s compare the tax implications of different filing choices for a U.S. citizen/resident with a spouse residing in Japan. For simplicity, we will ignore state taxes and use 2023 federal income tax rates and standard deductions.

Assumptions:

  • U.S. citizen husband (John)’s annual income: $80,000 (all U.S. source)
  • Japan-resident wife (Yoko)’s annual income:
    • Case A: $0 (no income)
    • Case B: $20,000 (Japan source income)
  • No dependents for the couple.

Case A: Wife (Yoko) has no income

Option 1: Married Filing Separately (MFS)

  • John’s Standard Deduction (MFS): $13,850
  • John’s Taxable Income: $80,000 – $13,850 = $66,150
  • John’s Federal Income Tax (MFS rates):
    • 10% on income up to $11,000 = $1,100
    • 12% on income from $11,001 to $44,725 = ($44,725 – $11,000) * 0.12 = $4,047
    • 22% on income from $44,726 to $66,150 = ($66,150 – $44,725) * 0.22 = $4,713.50
    • Total Tax: $1,100 + $4,047 + $4,713.50 = $9,865.50
  • Yoko’s income is not taxed by the U.S.

Option 2: Married Filing Jointly (MFJ) – with 6013(g) Election

  • Total Combined Income: $80,000 (John) + $0 (Yoko) = $80,000
  • MFJ Standard Deduction: $27,700
  • Taxable Income: $80,000 – $27,700 = $52,300
  • Federal Income Tax (MFJ rates):
    • 10% on income up to $22,000 = $2,200
    • 12% on income from $22,001 to $52,300 = ($52,300 – $22,000) * 0.12 = $3,636
    • Total Tax: $2,200 + $3,636 = $5,836

Result (Case A): When the spouse has no income, choosing MFJ saves approximately $4,029.50 ($9,865.50 – $5,836) in taxes. Even considering the effort to obtain an ITIN, MFJ is significantly more advantageous.

Case B: Wife (Yoko) has annual Japan-source income of $20,000

Option 1: Married Filing Separately (MFS)

  • John’s Tax: $9,865.50 (same as Case A)
  • Yoko’s income is not taxed by the U.S.
  • (Yoko pays Japanese taxes on her income separately in Japan)

Option 2: Married Filing Jointly (MFJ) – with 6013(g) Election

  • Total Combined Income: $80,000 (John) + $20,000 (Yoko) = $100,000
  • MFJ Standard Deduction: $27,700
  • Taxable Income: $100,000 – $27,700 = $72,300
  • Federal Income Tax (MFJ rates):
    • 10% on income up to $22,000 = $2,200
    • 12% on income from $22,001 to $72,300 = ($72,300 – $22,000) * 0.12 = $6,036
    • Total Tax (before Foreign Tax Credit): $2,200 + $6,036 = $8,236
  • Foreign Tax Credit: If Yoko paid, say, $1,000 in Japanese income tax on her $20,000 income, this amount may be creditable against the U.S. tax liability. The U.S. tax could potentially be $8,236 – $1,000 = $7,236 (Foreign Tax Credit calculations are complex and subject to limitations).

Result (Case B):

  • MFS: John’s tax is $9,865.50.
  • MFJ: After considering Foreign Tax Credit, the tax could be around $7,236.

In this scenario, MFJ still appears advantageous. However, if Yoko’s income were significantly higher, the benefits of MFJ might decrease, or MFS could even become more favorable. This is especially true if Yoko’s effective tax rate in Japan is lower than the U.S. marginal tax rate that would apply to her income under MFJ, potentially leading to additional U.S. tax liability.

Pros and Cons

Advantages of the MFJ Election with an NRA Spouse

  • Potential for Significant Tax Savings: Especially when the NRA spouse has no or very low income, the higher MFJ standard deduction and lower tax brackets can substantially reduce the U.S. taxpayer’s overall tax burden.
  • Access to Tax Credits: Many tax credits, such as the Child Tax Credit (CTC), are either only available or more beneficial when filing MFJ compared to MFS.
  • Simplified Planning (in some aspects): Reporting all household income on a single return can simplify tax planning for the couple.

Disadvantages of the MFJ Election with an NRA Spouse

  • NRA Spouse’s Worldwide Income Becomes U.S. Taxable: This is the most critical disadvantage. All of the NRA spouse’s income earned anywhere in the world (e.g., salaries, business income, rental income in Japan) becomes subject to U.S. taxation. If the NRA spouse has high income, choosing MFJ might result in a higher overall tax liability than MFS.
  • Complexity of ITIN Acquisition: The process of obtaining an ITIN, including potentially mailing original passports, can be time-consuming and cumbersome.
  • Disclosure Requirements: The NRA spouse must disclose their worldwide income and potentially their worldwide assets to the U.S. government.
  • Difficulty in Revoking Election: Once the 6013(g) election is made, it cannot be easily revoked without IRS permission.
  • State Tax Implications: Even if MFJ is chosen for federal taxes, state tax rules may differ. Many states may also treat the NRA spouse as a resident for state tax purposes, potentially subjecting their worldwide income to state taxation.

Common Pitfalls and Important Considerations

  • Confusing “Dependent” with “Spouse”: In U.S. tax law, a spouse is not a dependent. The spouse’s presence affects filing status, and MFJ provides tax benefits.
  • Lack of Awareness of Worldwide Income Reporting: Many taxpayers do not fully understand that electing to treat an NRA spouse as a resident alien means all of that spouse’s worldwide income must be reported to the U.S. and is subject to U.S. tax. This can lead to unexpected and substantial tax liabilities.
  • Delayed ITIN Acquisition: The ITIN must be obtained before the tax return is filed. Waiting until the last minute to apply can cause delays and missed deadlines.
  • Incorrect Application of Foreign Tax Credit: Not all taxes paid in Japan can be fully credited against U.S. tax liability. The Foreign Tax Credit has complex calculation rules and limitations.
  • Overlooking State Tax Implications: An MFJ election for federal tax purposes does not automatically guarantee favorable state tax treatment. It is crucial to check individual state tax laws.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Can I claim my Japan-resident spouse as a “dependent” on my U.S. tax return?
A1: Under U.S. tax law, a spouse cannot be claimed as a “dependent.” However, by making the election to treat your Non-Resident Alien (NRA) spouse as a resident alien (the 6013(g) Election), you can file as Married Filing Jointly (MFJ). This filing status offers a higher standard deduction and potentially lower tax rates, effectively providing tax benefits related to your spouse’s presence.
Q2: What if my spouse in Japan refuses to obtain an ITIN?
A2: If your spouse refuses to obtain an ITIN, you cannot make the 6013(g) election to treat them as a resident alien. In this situation, the U.S. citizen/resident alien taxpayer would typically file as “Married Filing Separately (MFS).” MFS generally offers fewer tax benefits compared to MFJ.
Q3: If I make the 6013(g) election and file MFJ, what happens to my spouse’s Japanese tax obligations?
A3: The 6013(g) election only affects your spouse’s status for U.S. tax purposes. It does not alter their tax obligations in Japan. Your spouse must continue to comply with Japanese tax laws regarding their income earned in Japan. However, in the U.S., you may be able to claim a Foreign Tax Credit for the taxes paid to Japan, helping to mitigate double taxation.
Q4: Is the 6013(g) election permanent?
A4: Once made, the 6013(g) election is generally irrevocable for all subsequent tax years unless terminated by certain events, such as divorce, the death of either spouse, or by obtaining IRS consent. To revoke the election, you typically need to apply to the IRS in writing and receive approval.

Conclusion: Understanding Complexities for Optimal Tax Planning

The treatment of dependents and spouses under U.S. tax law is fundamentally different from Japan’s system and can be complex. For U.S. taxpayers with a Non-Resident Alien spouse residing in Japan, electing to file Married Filing Jointly (MFJ) can offer significant tax advantages. However, it comes with the crucial caveat that the spouse’s worldwide income becomes subject to U.S. taxation. The process of obtaining an ITIN and the applicability of the U.S.-Japan Tax Treaty must also be thoroughly understood.

Tax situations in this area are highly individualized, and relying solely on general information can be misleading. To formulate the optimal tax strategy for your specific circumstances, it is highly recommended to consult with a qualified U.S. tax professional (such as a CPA or Enrolled Agent) who specializes in international tax matters. Proper planning and accurate filing can help you avoid unnecessary tax burdens and legally maximize your tax benefits.

#US Tax #Japan Tax #Dependents #Spousal Deduction #ITIN #Tax Treaty #Married Filing Jointly #Tax Planning #Expatriate Tax #Tax Compliance